Category Archives: Employment

Find a new role or job after redundancy

The job market is still pretty tight in April 2026, and IT is tougher than the headline unemployment numbers suggest because employers are hiring more selectively, keeping vacancy growth subdued, and raising the bar for experience. UK labour-market reporting says hiring is close to stabilising, but conditions remain challenging, and technology roles are resilient relative to the wider market rather than broadly easy to land [1][2].

What is happening

  • Employers are still cautious after a long slowdown in vacancies and hiring confidence, with UK reports describing the market as close to bottoming out rather than clearly recovering [1][2].
  • Competition is high because more candidates are chasing fewer openings, especially in entry-level and mid-level roles [3][2].
  • In IT, companies are still investing, but they are being very selective about which roles they open and often prefer people with niche, immediately useful skills [4][1].

Why IT feels harder

  • AI is reshaping hiring, and some employers are explicitly reducing junior or commodity-type roles because automation can handle part of that work [4][2].
  • Layoffs in tech have added experienced candidates back into the market, which makes competition worse for everyone else [5][6].
  • Many postings now expect broader skill sets than before, so “good enough” candidates often get filtered out quickly [4][3].

Where demand still exists

  • Cyber security, data, AI, cloud, and other specialist infrastructure roles are still among the strongest areas in the UK IT market [4][1].
  • Engineering and technology hiring is described as relatively more resilient than the wider labour market, even though demand is still weak compared with boom periods [1].
  • Employers are still looking for people who can deliver immediately, particularly in roles tied to automation, digital transformation, and AI enablement [4][1].

Practical read

If you are already in IT, the market is difficult but not dead: experienced people with scarce skills are still getting opportunities, while generic support, junior dev, and broad “all-rounder” roles are the hardest to place [4][2]. For job seekers, the main challenge in 2026 is not absolute lack of jobs, but a mismatch between what many employers want and what most applicants can show on paper [3][2].

A simple way to think about it: 2026 is not a “no jobs” market, it is a “harder to get shortlisted” market, especially in IT [1][3].

How long to find IT job after layoff 2026?

In 2026, a realistic IT job-search timeline after a layoff is often 4 to 6 months, with some people landing in 6 to 8 weeks and others taking much longer depending on seniority, specialization, location, and how targeted their search is [1][2]. Broader job-market data also suggests the average job search after a layoff is around five to six months, which lines up with the tech-specific estimates [2].

Typical timeline

  • Fast outcomes: about 6 to 8 weeks if your skills are in demand, you have strong referrals, and you apply very selectively [1][3].
  • Common outcome: about 4 to 6 months for many IT professionals in 2026 [1][2].
  • Slower cases: 8 months or more if you are aiming for remote roles, a narrow niche, or senior positions with very few openings [4][5].

Why it takes longer

  • ATS filtering and high application volumes mean many strong candidates never reach a recruiter [1].
  • Tech layoffs have increased the supply of experienced applicants, so competition is tighter than in a normal year [6][7].
  • Employers are hiring more cautiously and often want people who can contribute immediately with minimal ramp-up [8][9].

What affects your speed

  • Seniority matters: mid-level specialists often move faster than generalists because they can show clear value [3][1].
  • Location and flexibility matter: being open to onsite or hybrid roles can shorten the search compared with insisting on fully remote work [4].
  • Targeting matters: referred candidates and focused applications usually outperform broad mass-applying [1].

Practical expectation

For someone with solid IT experience, a good planning assumption in 2026 is three to six months, with a faster result possible if you have in-demand cloud, security, observability, or platform skills and a strong network [8][9][1]. If your profile is broader or your target is very specific, plan for the search to last longer and budget accordingly [2][5]

What strategies cut IT job search to under 3 months after layoff

To get under 3 months, the winning pattern is: target fewer roles, use warm introductions, tailor aggressively, and move fast in the first 2 weeks [1][2]. The fastest recoveries are not from spraying applications everywhere; they come from building a shortlist of target companies, speaking to people inside them, and getting referred before the role is crowded [1][6].

What works best

  • Build a target list of about 10 to 15 companies and focus on them hard rather than applying broadly [1].
  • Reach out to 3 people at each target company, ideally future teammates or adjacent peers rather than only recruiters [1].
  • Ask for short, specific conversations, then follow up every 2 to 3 weeks with something useful or relevant [1].
  • Keep your CV tightly matched to each role so it is easy to read and directly aligned with the posting [3][7].

Speed levers

  • Apply in the first 24 to 72 hours after a role is posted, when fewer candidates have piled in [1].
  • Use on-site or hybrid options if you can tolerate them, because sticking to fully remote roles can slow the search [1].
  • Stay in your current lane unless a pivot is truly justified; searches are faster when you sell proven experience rather than a brand-new direction [1].
  • Add contract, interim, or freelance work as a bridge if the market is slow; that keeps income coming and preserves momentum [2][9].

First 30 days

  • Days 1 to 3: fix CV, LinkedIn, references, and a target list [2].
  • Days 4 to 10: start outreach and referrals before spending heavy time on applications [1][6].
  • Days 10 to 30: run parallel tracks of networking, direct applications, and interview prep so you are not waiting on any one channel [2][3].
  • Keep a tracker so you can see which companies and contacts actually produce interviews [2].

For IT roles

The best odds of getting under 3 months are in higher-demand areas like cloud, security, data, platform engineering, and AI-adjacent infrastructure work [11][12]. Generalist support or commoditised roles usually take longer, so narrowing your pitch to scarce, business-critical skills matters more than ever [11][13]. In IT, referrals and a very specific value proposition often beat raw application volume [1][6].

Simple rule

If you want a sub-3-month outcome, think in terms of 10 target firms, 30 meaningful contacts, 2 tailored applications per day, and interview prep from day one [1][2][3]. That combination is much more likely to produce momentum than waiting for job boards to do the work [1][7].

How to use AI to help job searching

AI can help most if you use it to reduce admin, improve targeting, and sharpen your pitch rather than to mass-apply for roles. The biggest wins are tailoring CVs to each role, drafting outreach messages, organizing applications, and preparing for interviews faster [1][2][5].

Best uses

  • Tailor your CV to a job description by extracting keywords and matching your experience to the role [1][4][6].
  • Draft cover letters and recruiter messages quickly, then edit them so they sound like you [1][5].
  • Build a shortlist of target companies and roles from your skills, location, and preferences [1][7].
  • Track applications, follow-ups, interview dates, and contacts in one place [3][5].
  • Prepare for interviews with role-specific questions, mock answers, and STAR-story prompts [2][10].

A good workflow

  1. Paste the job description into AI and ask for the top skills, likely screening keywords, and gaps in your CV [1][4].
  2. Ask it to rewrite your summary and bullets around measurable outcomes, not responsibilities [2][10].
  3. Generate a tailored outreach note for a hiring manager, recruiter, or employee referral contact [1][2].
  4. Use AI to turn your notes into a cleaner application tracker and follow-up plan [3][5].
  5. Before interviews, ask for likely technical and behavioral questions based on the role and company [2][10].

What works especially well in IT

For IT roles, AI is most useful when you use it to map your experience to specific stacks and outcomes, such as cloud migration, observability, DevOps, security, data engineering, or platform reliability [1][4]. It can help you turn broad experience into stronger role-specific language, which matters a lot when recruiters are filtering for exact keywords [1][4]. It is also helpful for finding adjacent roles you may not have considered, especially if you want to pivot within infrastructure or operations [7][10].

What not to do

  • Do not send AI-written applications without editing them for accuracy and voice [1][6].
  • Do not rely on AI scores alone; they can miss context or overrate generic keyword stuffing [8][5].
  • Do not use it to invent experience, certifications, or achievements [10].
  • Do not mass-apply just because AI makes it easy; the best results still come from targeted roles and real networking [11][2].

Simple prompt pattern

A strong prompt is: “Here is my CV and this job description. Identify missing keywords, rewrite my summary for this role, suggest 5 stronger bullets, and draft a short recruiter message.” That gives you a focused output instead of a generic blob [1][4][10].

Is 2026 Going to be the Worst Year for IT Layoffs?

So far in 2026, the biggest IT/tech layoffs have been driven by AI spending, restructuring, and cost cuts, with published trackers putting the total anywhere from roughly 45,000 to nearly 94,000 cuts depending on scope and date [1][2][3]. The single largest named cut is Amazon’s 16,000 corporate layoffs in January, while Oracle, Meta, Atlassian, Block, Pinterest, and a growing list of others have also announced significant reductions [1][4][5][6].

Biggest known layoffs

  • Amazon: 16,000 jobs cut in 2026 so far, the largest single contributor to year-to-date tech layoffs [1][7].
  • Oracle: reports range from “thousands” to as many as 30,000 jobs, with widespread cuts beginning at the end of March [8][4][9].
  • Meta: multiple rounds in 2026, including about 700 jobs in March and earlier Reality Labs cuts of around 1,000 roles [10][5].
  • Atlassian: about 1,600 jobs, or 10% of its workforce, announced in March [6].
  • Block: 4,000 jobs, framed as a shift toward AI and automation [11].
  • Pinterest: roughly 675 jobs, about 15% of staff, tied to AI and restructuring [11][12].

Other notable cuts

  • GoPro announced 145 layoffs in April as part of restructuring and cost reduction [6].
  • EBay, WiseTech Global, Livspace, ANGI Homeservices, and MercadoLibre were also listed in early-2026 AI-related layoff roundups [11].
  • Reports also mention cuts at Disney, Snap, Epic Games, Riot Games, Salesforce, Autodesk, and others across the first quarter [2][13][14].

What the numbers say

  • One tracker-based roundup put early-2026 tech layoffs at 45,363 globally by early March [1].
  • Another put the figure at 78,557 by early April, while TrueUp-based reporting cited about 91,739 impacted workers at 229 layoff events [3][15].
  • A March report said about 9,238 cuts were directly linked to AI adoption and automation, roughly one-fifth of the total then [11].
  • The broad pattern across reports is that the U.S. accounts for most of the job losses and AI is now a major stated reason rather than just a background trend [1][3].

Important caveat

These totals vary because different trackers count different things: announced vs confirmed cuts, tech-only vs broader IT-adjacent roles, and single layoffs vs multiple rounds at the same company [1][2][16]. That means the safest takeaway is not one exact number, but that 2026 has already seen a very large wave of tech layoffs, led by Amazon and Oracle, with AI investment a central driver [1][4][16].

What is actually happening in 2025–2026

  • Tech layoffs re-accelerated through 2025, with over 100,000 tech workers cut and more than 200 tech companies reducing headcount globally.[economictimes]​
  • Many of these 2025 cuts came from large players (Amazon, Intel, TCS, Google, Meta) shifting priorities, especially towards AI and away from older or lower‑margin lines.[tomshardware]​
  • Early 2026 has already seen fresh rounds from firms like Meta (Reality Labs), Citigroup, and BlackRock, suggesting the 2025 pattern is carrying into this year.[business-standard]​

Why leaders expect more cuts in 2026

  • Surveys of executives show a clear bias towards staying lean: roughly two‑thirds of CEOs say they plan to either cut or hold headcount flat in 2026 rather than grow it.[saastr]​
  • One 2025 survey of 1,000 US business leaders found half had already pulled back on hiring, nearly 40% had done layoffs in 2025, and a majority expected further layoffs to be likely in 2026.[hrdive]​
  • Another survey of hiring managers reported that more than half expect layoffs in 2026 and see AI as a top driver of those cuts, especially for white‑collar roles.[informationweek]​

AI, “invisible unemployment,” and who is most exposed

  • A growing chunk of the pain is “invisible”: roles quietly eliminated via attrition, aggressive performance management, relocation/RTO pressure, and not backfilling departures, so the headline layoff numbers understate the chill.[saastr]​
  • Economists and industry observers describe 2026 as a “Great Freeze”: fewer new openings, more restructuring, and companies using AI plus process changes to do the same work with fewer people.[linkedin]​
  • High‑salary staff without strong AI or automation skills, recently hired employees, and some entry‑level roles are viewed by executives as the highest‑risk groups for future cuts.[hrdive]​

How this likely feels in tech and AI infra

  • For people in tech, 2026 is likely to feel like a grinding reset: fewer net new roles, more churn between companies, and continued pressure on anything tied purely to speculative AI or overbuilt infra.[info.siteselectiongroup]​
  • At the same time, companies are heavily investing in a smaller core of people who can build, operate, and productize AI and automation, including infra and observability talent, rather than cutting across the board.[finalroundai]​

Practical implications for you

  • Treat 2026 as a year to be defensive:
    • Make sure your current role is visibly tied to cost savings, reliability, or revenue, not just “innovation theatre”.[perplexity]​
    • Double down on AI‑adjacent skills (MLOps, GPU/AI infra, automation with AI copilots) so you’re in the “kept and retrained” cohort rather than the expendable one.[tomshardware]​
  • If you’re in AI/data‑center/infra, the risk is more about over‑concentration in a fragile employer or product line than the whole category disappearing; diversified or sovereign‑backed infra tends to ride out the cycle better.[perplexity]​

A-Z of 2026 Layoffs

A is for Amazon

B is for Block

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/26/business/block-layoffs-ai-jack-dorsey

M is for Meta

https://www.wsj.com/tech/meta-layoffs-reality-labs-2026-347008b0

https://ww.fashionnetwork.com/news/Meta-targets-may-20-for-first-wave-of-layoffs-additional-cuts-later-in-2026,1824714.html

https://cryptonews.net/news/metaverse/32726808/

O is for Oracle

https://medium.com/codex/the-stargate-sacrifice-why-oracle-is-cutting-30-000-jobs-to-bankroll-a-156-billion-bet-on-openai-4400b02e3f21

https://opentools.ai/news/oracles-bay-area-shake-up-layoffs-hit-oci-and-aiml-teams

https://www.peoplematters.in/news/strategic-hr/oracle-plans-to-cut-over-250-jobs-in-bay-area-in-latest-layoff-round-48115

https://www.cio.com/article/4125103/oracle-may-slash-up-to-30000-jobs-to-fund-ai-data-center-expansion-as-us-banks-retreat.html

What would an AI crash look like?

An AI crash would resemble a hybrid of the 1990s dot-com bust and the 2008 financial crisis—but centered around artificial intelligence infrastructure, data centers, and corporate overinvestment. It would likely begin as a sudden market correction in overvalued AI firms and GPU suppliers, then spread through the financial system and tech economy as debt and demand collapse.

Market and Investment Collapse

In early stages, overleveraged companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, or firms heavily reliant on GPU compute (e.g., Nvidia, Oracle, Microsoft) would face sharp valuation drops as AI-generated revenues fail to justify trillion-dollar capital expenditures. Investor panic could trigger a chain reaction, collapsing the leveraged network of data‑center finance. Bloomberg and the Bank of England have both warned of a “sudden correction” and circular investing between chip firms and hyperscalers that artificially props up earnings.transformernews+1

The Data Center Bust

According to historian Margaret O’Mara and business analyst Shane Greenstein, AI data centers—many purpose‑built for model training using GPUs—are highly specialized and often remote from urban demand. These centers might last only 3–5 years and have little reuse value outside AI or crypto mining. If capital inflows freeze, thousands of megawatts of compute could become stranded assets, comparable to the empty fiber networks after the dot‑com collapse.transformernews

Economic Impact

The International Monetary Fund estimates roughly a third of current US GDP growth depends on AI-related investment. If the bubble bursts, consumption could fall from loss of “AI wealth effects,” dragging global markets into recession. Analysts at Transformer News liken it to Britain’s 1840s railway mania: vast sums invested in technology that ultimately enriched the future economy—at the cost of investors’ ruin.globalcapital+2

Consequences for Jobs and Technology

For the workforce, the crash would begin with mass layoffs across the tech sector and data‑center construction, followed by second‑order layoffs in software, marketing, and education technology. However, as with the post‑dot‑com era, redundant talent and abandoned infrastructure could later fuel a new, leaner AI industry based on sustainable business models.reddit+2

Systemic and Political Risks

While the contagion risk is smaller than subprime mortgages in 2008, debt-financed AI expansion—Oracle’s $100 billion borrowing plan with OpenAI being one example—creates vulnerability for lenders and investors. Should a major firm default, cascading insolvencies could ripple through the supply chain, forcing governments to intervene. Some analysts expect this crash would prompt stricter AI regulation and financing guardrails reminiscent of those enacted after the Great Depression.transformernews

Long-Term View

If artificial general intelligence (AGI) does eventually deliver major productivity gains, early investments may appear prescient. But if not, a 2020s AI crash would leave disused GPU campuses and massive debt—an exuberant experiment that accelerated technological progress at ruinous human cost.unherd+2

Which industries would collapse first in an AI crash

In the event of an AI crash, several sectors would be hit first and hardest — especially those that have overexpanded based on speculative expectations of AI-driven profits or infrastructure demand. The collapse would cascade through high-capex industries, ripple across financial services, and disrupt employment-dependent consumer sectors.

Semiconductor and GPU Manufacturing

The semiconductor industry would be the first to collapse due to its heavy dependence on AI demand. Data center GPUs currently drive over 90% of Nvidia’s server revenue, and the entire sector’s value nearly doubled between 2024 and 2025 based on AI compute growth forecasts. If hyperscaler demand dries up, the oversupply of GPUs, high-bandwidth memory (HBM), and AI ASICs could cause a price crash similar to the telecom equipment bust in 2002. Chip makers and startups like Groq, Cerebras, and Tenstorrent—heavily leveraged to AI workloads—would struggle to survive the sudden capital freeze.digitalisationworld

Cloud and Data Center Infrastructure

AI-heavy cloud providers such as Microsoft Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, and Oracle Cloud would see massive write-downs in data center assets. Overbuilt hyperscale and sovereign AI campuses could become stranded investments worth billions as training workloads decline and electricity costs remain high. This dynamic mirrors the way dark fiber networks from the 1990s dot-com era lay idle for years after overinvestment.digitalisationworld

Digital Advertising and Marketing

The advertising and media sector—already experiencing erosion due to AI‑generated content—would decline abruptly. Companies like WPP have already lost 50% of their stock value in 2025 due to automated ad-generation technologies cannibalizing human creative work. As AI content generation saturates the market, profit margins in marketing, online publishing, and synthetic media platforms like Shutterstock and Wix could collapse.ainvest

Financial and Staffing Services

Financial services and staffing firms are another early casualty. AI has already automated large portions of transaction processing, compliance, and manual recruitment. Firms such as ManpowerGroup and Robert Half have reportedly seen 30–50% market value declines due to these pressures. In an AI crash, their exposure to risk-laden corporate clients and shrinking demand for human labor matching would deepen losses, while regulators tighten AI governance in compliance-heavy finance.ainvest

Transportation and Logistics

The transportation and logistics sector, closely tied to AI investment through autonomous systems, faces structural weakness. Millions of driving and delivery jobs could disappear due to automation, but the firms funding autonomous fleets—such as Tesla Freight and Aurora Innovations—would hemorrhage cash if capital dries up before widespread profitability. AI‑powered routing and warehouse systems could be written down as expensive overcapacity.ainvest

Secondary Collapse: Retail and Customer Support

Finally, customer‑facing retail and support sectors would be heavily affected. With AI chatbots now handling about 80% of common queries, these labor markets are already contracting. A market shock would worsen layoffs while eroding spending power, compounding the downturn.ainvest

Summary Table

IndustryCollapse TriggerFirst-Order ImpactExample Companies Affected
SemiconductorsGPU oversupply, hyperscaler pullbackRevenue crashes, fab overcapacityNvidia, AMD, TSMC, Cerebras digitalisationworld
Cloud & Data CentersHalt in AI training spendIdle assets, megacenter write-downsMicrosoft, AWS, Oracle Cloud digitalisationworld
Advertising & MediaAutomated ad content cannibalizationLoss of billable creative workWPP, Shutterstock, Wix ainvest
Financial & StaffingJob automation, credit exposureRapid fall in client demand, defaultsManpowerGroup, Robert Half ainvest
TransportationDelay in autonomous projectsJob losses, asset devaluationTesla Freight, Aurora, Waymo ainvest
Retail & SupportCustomer service automationWidespread workforce reductionShopify, Zendesk ainvest

In short, the first phase of an AI crash would decimate GPU suppliers and infrastructure providers, followed by cascading losses in services and labor markets that relied on sustained AI adoption and speculative investor optimism.

The Hyperscalers who would be most affected in an AI crash

The hyperscalers most severely affected by an AI crash would be those that have sunk the largest capital into AI‑specific data center expansion without commensurate returns—primarily Microsoft, Amazon (AWS), Alphabet (Google Cloud), Meta, Oracle, and to a lesser extent GPU‑specialist partners like CoreWeave and Crusoe Energy Systems. These companies are deep in an investment cycle driven by trillion‑dollar valuations and multi‑gigawatt data center commitments, meaning a downturn would cripple balance sheets, strand assets, and force major write‑downs.

Microsoft

Microsoft is the hyperscaler most exposed to an AI collapse. It has committed $80 billion for fiscal 2025 to AI‑optimized data centers, largely to support OpenAI’s model training workloads on Azure. Over half this investment is in the U.S., focusing on high‑power, GPU‑dense facilities that may become stranded if demand for model training plunges. The company also co‑leads multi‑partner mega‑projects like Stargate, a $500 billion AI campus venture involving SoftBank and Oracle.ft+1

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

AWS is next in risk magnitude, with $86 billion in active AI infrastructure commitments spanning Indiana, Virginia, and Frankfurt. Many of its new campuses are dedicated to AI‑as‑a‑Service workloads and custom silicon (Trainium, Inferentia). If model‑training customers scale back, AWS faces overcapacity in power‑hungry clusters designed for sustained maximum utilization. Analysts warn that such facilities are difficult to repurpose for general cloud usage due to 10× higher rack power and cooling loads.thenetworkinstallers+1

Alphabet (Google Cloud)

Google’s parent company, Alphabet, has pledged around $75 billion in AI infrastructure spending in 2025 alone—heavily concentrated in server farms for Gemini model operations. The company’s shift to AI‑dense GPU clusters has already required ripping and rebuilding sites mid‑construction. In a crash, Alphabet’s reliance on advertising to subsidize capex would expose it to compounding financial stress.ft+1

Meta

Meta’s risk is driven by scale and ambition rather than cloud dependency. The company is investing $60–65 billion into a network of AI superclusters, including a 2 GW data center in Louisiana designed purely for model training. Mark Zuckerberg’s goal to reach “superintelligence” entails constant full‑load operation—meaning unused compute in a recession would yield enormous sunk‑cost losses.hanwhadatacenters+1

Oracle

Oracle, a late entrant to the hyperscaler race, ranks as the fourth largest hyperscaler and has become deeply tied to OpenAI’s infrastructure build. It is reportedly providing 400,000 Nvidia GPUs—worth about $40 billion—for OpenAI’s Texas and UAE campuses under the Stargate project. Oracle’s dependency on a few high‑risk customers makes it vulnerable to disproportionate collapse if those clients cut capital expenditures.ft

GPU Cloud Specialists (CoreWeave, Crusoe, Lambda)

Although smaller in scale, CoreWeave, Crusoe Energy Systems, and Lambda Labs face acute financial danger. Each is highly leveraged to GPU leasing economics that assume near‑continuous utilization. A pause in large‑model training would break their cash flow structure, causing defaults among the so‑called “neo‑cloud” providers.hanwhadatacenters

Comparative Exposure Overview

HyperscalerEstimated 2025 AI CapexPrimary Risk ChannelVulnerability in a Crash
Microsoft$80 billionOverexposure to OpenAI workloadsExtremely high hanwhadatacenters
Amazon (AWS)$86 billionIdle compute, train‑specific sitesVery high thenetworkinstallers
Alphabet$75 billionAdvertising decline + AI site overbuildHigh thenetworkinstallers
Meta$60–65 billionPure AI data center utilization riskHigh hanwhadatacenters
Oracle$40 billion (via Stargate)Concentrated tenant risk (OpenAI)Very high ft
CoreWeave / Crusoe / Lambda$10–15 billion rangeDebt leverage and GPU lease dependenceExtreme hanwhadatacenters

Summary

A sustained AI market collapse would first hit these hyperscalers through GPU underutilization, stranded data‑center capacity, and debt‑heavy infrastructure financing. Microsoft, Oracle, and Meta would face the most immediate write‑downs given their recent megaproject commitments. Amazon and Google, while financially stronger, would absorb heavy revenue compression. Specialized GPU‑cloud providers—CoreWeave, Crusoe, and Lambda—could fail outright due to funding constraints and dependence on short‑term AI demand surges.thenetworkinstallers+2

The Nature of IT RIFs (reduction in force aka layoffs aka mass redundancies)

If you work for any IT company and see Slack users all of a sudden disappearing – then your company is performing a RIF. Out of the blue or with very short notice – a colleague or two’s Slack account is closed and you are left wondering why.

This trend has been around for a while now and sprung sites such as https://layoffs.fyi/ documenting the unprecedented amount of layoffs in the IT industry. Other sites document layoffs in other industries (e.g. UK education and civil service) too, and paints a gloomy picture of the state of unemployment and an extreme tough jobs market.

My current employer is make a round of RIF this moment in time! Hence this article about RIFs. I was affected by a RIF a year ago with a different corporation, so I am putting in motion things to do from the lessons I learnt from last time. I hope this will help anyone affected this time…

Trust No One

When you are being told that there is a round of RIF and “we are not affected” or “we are safe” by your manager or director – do not trust them. When this announcement is made interpret this as “you need to make plans and execute them ASAP in preparation that you will be affected”. Until the RIF round is “official” over, then consider this “unknown” period is your “at-risk” period.

By UK employment rules (the minimum that corporations will follow) your employer will have to give you an “at-risk” period (different from above!) When they give you this notice, you are able to stop work and look for other roles – internally OR externally).

My previous employer when they gave me this “at-risk” period, had already frozen hiring and no new “req”s were granted, making it impossible to get an internal role if you wanted to stay with your employer. In this situation you are effectively certain of being made redundant and will have to leave their employment…

You need to put things into place if you are going to survive the redundancy.

The Nature of IT RIFs

Two is not a pattern to draw definite conclusions on but it seems to me that when a corporation announces a record profit-making quarter, they follow this up by a record spend which forces them to make a RIF. This is the way…

The nature of IT recruitment and redundancies seem to have established a boom and bust pattern. Corporations overspend and over-recruit to achieve a commercial objective or goal (usually adding as much value to the corps as possible) and when this funding-period is over, they then perform a RIF to be able to start the next project. This is an evil cycle for the all employees, not just those who are let go.

When a RIF occurs, there’s little rhyme or reason why specific individual is affected. The main directive or goal of a RIF is to reduce costs so the corps can make up the huge spend or fund the new project – nowadays it is certain to be AI. The lowest hanging fruits will be picked first and then maybe the projects that are costing most but have delivered little and then just randomly in areas that (to the bosses) are not important. Of course, to the individual, we are all important so we ask the question why me? Why my team? Why my organisation?

There is no reason – even if your manager or director gives you a reason – this will not be it!

Accept and Move On

Successful people turn disadvantages to advantages – they accept the situation, deal with it fast – learn from the situation – and move on! They do not “sulk” or “get down” or “get stuck” – they learn, try again, try something different until they succeed. This is what anyone affected by RIF must do. When I say “accept and move on” yes, I mean accept the severance package and start on your CV/Resume and start job hunting… or if you are due a good package, buy that Porsche you’ve always wanted and drive it… into a traffic jam…

One of the help that might be available to someone who is “at-risk” is free consultation with a career coach. I must admit, I was very skeptical about this free facility at first, but once I ventured out to look at the job market, I find myself turning around and was open to help, tips, advice and motivation of any kind to get a head start.

The job market has changed a lot and has also gotten tougher and tougher with each round of redundancies. You need al the advice and coaching you can get. The successful things you did to attain the job/role that you’ve juts been made redundant from will NOT work this time! You need new job hunting skills, tools and be adaptable to the current state of the market.

Those who have not hunted for new roles or moved jobs in the past 5 or 10 years will have to learn and act fast! I see that even talent advisors and experience recruiters struggle to find new roles for themselves let alone for others…

What To Do?

This is my list – it needs to be adapted for your personal needs/situation – it is just to give you something to start with:

  1. Update/rewrite your CV/Resume
    • Your CV/resume will be current so update
    • Your CV/resume will not be in a modern format/layout
    • Your CV/resume will need to be tailored to the role
    • Your CV/resume will need to be in a format for auto-form-filling easier
    • Your CV/resume will need to be in a format for AI to process and not reject you without passing it on to a human!
  2. Create a generic cover letter
    • Your roles will be very similar in requirements, so a generic letter will save time
    • Leave areas for specifics, but don’t forget to change those specifics
  3. Sign up to LinkedIn and other job boards
    • These sites will have job hunting tips and advice so take advantage
    • These sites allow you to network so take advantage
    • These sites might have training courses or practise facilities
  4. Reach-out to contact and ex-colleagues
    • There maybe suitable vacancies with their employer
    • Ask them to spread the message that you are looking for a new role
  5. Create a spreadsheet of job applications
    • You will soon lose track of what company, the recruiter, the role, etc that you’ve applied for an why – keep a spreadsheet of all relevant info
  6. Create a routine of job searching/application and rest
    • You will need to be disciplined so a route that works with rest breaks to relieve the stress will keep you going until you are successful
  7. Practise interviews. conversations, and coding tests, etc.
    • You will need to be sharp and effective in your interview, practise and deploy all the tricks and methods for effective interview e.g. using S.T.A.R. method and the like.
    • Practise in a Zoom session and record yourself, playback to evaluate how you perform and what you should do and not do, say and not say

Good Luck!

Do not give up! And do not stop once you’ve achieved a new role! Work as though you are under threat of being made redundant – there is no such thing as a safe job any more – always actively develop and progress to the next role…

I am writing this in a situation when I am actually in my “at-risk” period… But as I’ve started this process well before the RIF news, I think I am ahead in the job queue (although not necessary near the very start!)